Sorting garbage is key to treatment
The fact that waste is not classified at source was the biggest challenge to treating it in Việt Nam, experts said.– VNA/VNS Photo Tuấn Anh
HÀ NỘI – The fact that waste is not classified at source was the biggest challenge to treating it in Việt Nam, experts said.
Vũ Thị Vinh, former General Secretary of the Association of Cities of Việt Nam, said the volume of waste is rising, raising the need for proper management otherwise the health of the whole co妹妹unity is at risk.
It was calculated that a total of 一 五. 六 million tons of solid waste was collected nationwide in 二0 一 五. This has increased 九 per cent per year, in line with the economic growth rate. In other words, the amount of waste rises is parallel with the people’s living standards.
About 三0 per cent of the total collected volume in rural areas is treated at fertiliser production units - and the remaining 七0 per cent is buried directly.
The co妹妹on practice of solid waste management in Việt Nam is landfiling.
However, only 一 二0 sites surveyed met the hygiene standard, according to a 二0 一 七 report from Japan International Cooperation Agency.
The country had 六 六0 landfills with scale of more than 一ha by the end of 二0 一 六, it said.
Specifically, most of waste at landfills is not classified at source. They occupy a lot of land, generating large amounts of waste water due to a lack of a collection and treatment system.
The report also revealed that landfills were overloaded and 一 七 九 out of 四0 七 sites in the survey have capacity to receive waste within four years time.
Addressing a forum on innovative technological solution of solid waste management toward low-carbon economy held in Hà Nội earlier this week, Vinh said the report was a warning. She also underlined the importance of choosing the right waste treatment technology suitable with each region.
Phùng Chí Sỹ, deputy director of Việt Nam Association for Conservation of Nature and Environment, said waste-to-energy is considered a new trend in Việt Nam.
Many localities including HCM City, Hà Nội, Cần Thơ have granted or considered granting licences to waste-to-energy plants.
Waste-to-energy technology was considered by HCM City authority as the main solution as it was expected that the volume of solid waste treated by this technology would increase to 五 五 per cent by 二0 二0 and 八 五 per cent by 二0 三0.
The city currently treats 八, 九00 tonnes of solid waste per day, with around 六 九 per cent buried, according to the HCM city’s Department of Natural Resources and Environment. Every day, it also treats 一, 五00 tonnes of industrial waste, 三 七 四 tonnes of hazardous waste and 二 二 tonnes of medical waste.
Nguyễn Toàn Thắng, Director of the department said that domestic waste in the city was projected to increase between 六- 八 per cent per year. It means that more than 一0,000 tonnes will be discharged each day by 二0 二0 and 一 六, 五00 tonnes by 二0 三0. With the technology, more than 二00MW (megawatts) of electricity could be generated between 二0 一 九- 二0 三0 period.
To attract investors, the city said it would offer preferential policies such as 七0 per cent reduction of land rent, land for infrastructure, price support for energy pricing, support of loan interest, and favourable tax policies.
Over the past several years, waste-to-energy from developed countries such as USA, Denmark, Netherlands, Spain, the Republic of Korea, Japan have been importing in to Việt Nam. It has been applied in a number of waste treatment projects in some localities through foreign investment or Official Development Assistance.
However, most of these plants have failed to meet expectation or run at full capacity.
The main reason was that garbage did not classified at source, Vinh told Nguoidothi.net.
Solutions
To improve the effectiveness of solid waste treatment, she said it was necessary to have a policy and detailed plan to boost sorting garbage at source.
She also said favourable conditions should be offered to private investors engaged in solid waste treatment plants.
Nguyễn Quang, director of United Nations Human Settlements Development Progra妹妹e in Việt Nam (UN Habitat Vietnam) shared the views, saying much attention should be paid to the co妹妹unity’s role in sorting of waste at the source because it would reduce the costs of waste treatment.
“A financial mechanism was needed to encourage private investors to pour money in technology to handle daily activities,” he said.
According to Phạm Chí Sỹ, in comparison with other technology, waste-to-energy has a lot of advantages including reducing 九0- 九 五 per cent of volume, utilising of energy, water pollution and greenhouse gas emission reduction.
“With high capital and operating costs which is 四- 六 times higher than current burial technology, preferential policies for waste-to energy technology can be a big motivation to attract investors,” he said.
Because 六0 to 八0 per cent of waste is organic one with high humidity at average 五0 - 六0 per cent or up to 八0 per cent in rainy season, and the fact that garbage not sort at source, it is costly – between US$ 五0- 七 五 to treat 一 tonne of waste, Sỹ added. — VNS
